[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160511091930.GE14744@quack2.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 11:19:30 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v3] [PATCH 0/18] DAX page fault locking
On Tue 10-05-16 16:39:37, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 02:30:03PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 05:28:14PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > On Mon 09-05-16 11:38:28, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > Somehow, I'm not able to reproduce the warnings... Anyway, I think I see
> > > what's going on. Can you check whether the warning goes away when you
> > > change the condition at the end of page_cache_tree_delete() to:
> > >
> > > if (!dax_mapping(mapping) && !workingset_node_pages(node) &&
> > > list_empty(&node->private_list)) {
> >
> > Yep, this took care of both of the issues that I reported. I'll restart my
> > testing with this in my baseline, but as of this fix I don't have any more
> > open testing issues. :)
>
> Well, looks like I spoke too soon. The two tests that were failing for me are
> now passing, but I can still create what looks like a related failure using
> XFS, DAX, and the two xfstests generic/231 and generic/232 run back-to-back.
Hum, full xfstests run completes for me just fine. Can you reproduce the
issue with the attached debug patch? Thanks!
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
View attachment "0001-Debugging-workingset.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (1674 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists