[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <574A0F72.6020609@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 May 2016 16:36:50 -0500
From: Bruce Dubbs <bruce.dubbs@...il.com>
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: e2fsprogs-1.43 make check failures
When building e2fsprogs we normally ask users to run 'make check'. For
e2fsprogs-1.42.13 we had '153 tests succeeded, 0 tests failed', but for
version 1.43, we have '62 tests succeeded, 265 tests failed'.
Many of the failures look like:
$ cat f_lpffile.failed
--- ../../tests/f_lpffile/expect.1 2009-08-13 01:39:58.000000000 +0000
+++ f_lpffile.1.log 2016-05-28 19:40:20.364025801 +0000
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+e2fsck 1.43 (17-May-2016)
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
Pass 2: Checking directory structure
Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
--- ../../tests/f_lpffile/expect.2 2009-08-13 01:39:58.000000000 +0000
+++ f_lpffile.2.log 2016-05-28 19:40:20.367025703 +0000
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+e2fsck 1.43 (17-May-2016)
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
Pass 2: Checking directory structure
Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
In fact running:
[ /sources/e2fsprogs-1.43/build/tests ]$ grep ^+ *.failed|grep -v
1.43|grep -v @@|grep -v +++
gives no output. My conclusion is that all the tests actually pass, but
the expected results need to be updated in the release tarball.
-- Bruce Dubbs
linuxfromscratch.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists