linux-ext4 - Re: xfstests generic/130 hang with non-4k block size ext4 on 4.7-rc1 kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87oa79h9on.fsf@gooddata.com>
Date:	Fri, 10 Jun 2016 07:52:56 +0200
From:	Nikola Pajkovsky <nikola.pajkovsky@...ddata.com>
To:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc:	Holger Hoffstätte 
	<holger@...lied-asynchrony.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
Subject: Re: xfstests generic/130 hang with non-4k block size ext4 on 4.7-rc1 kernel

Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> writes:

> On Thu 09-06-16 09:23:29, Nikola Pajkovsky wrote:
>> Holger Hoffstätte <holger@...lied-asynchrony.com> writes:
>> 
>> > On Wed, 08 Jun 2016 14:56:31 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
>> > (snip)
>> >> Attached patch fixes the issue for me. I'll submit it once a full xfstests
>> >> run finishes for it (which may take a while as our server room is currently
>> >> moving to a different place).
>> >> 
>> >> 								Honza
>> >> -- 
>> >> Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
>> >> SUSE Labs, CR
>> >> From 3a120841a5d9a6c42bf196389467e9e663cf1cf8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> >> From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
>> >> Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 10:01:45 +0200
>> >> Subject: [PATCH] ext4: Fix deadlock during page writeback
>> >> 
>> >> Commit 06bd3c36a733 (ext4: fix data exposure after a crash) uncovered a
>> >> deadlock in ext4_writepages() which was previously much harder to hit.
>> >> After this commit xfstest generic/130 reproduces the deadlock on small
>> >> filesystems.
>> >
>> > Since you marked this for -stable, just a heads-up that the previous patch
>> > for the data exposure was rejected from -stable (see [1]) because it
>> > has the mismatching "!IS_NOQUOTA(inode) &&" line, which didn't exist
>> > until 4.6. I removed it locally but Greg probably wants an official patch.
>> >
>> > So both this and the previous patch need to be submitted.
>> >
>> > [1] http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.stable/18074{4,5,6}
>> 
>> I'm just wondering if the Jan's patch is not related to blocked
>> processes in following trace. It very hard to hit it and I don't have
>> any reproducer.
>
> This looks like a different issue. Does the machine recover itself or is it
> a hard hang and you have to press a reset button?

The machine is bit bigger than I have pretend. It's 18 vcpu with 160 GB
ram and machine has dedicated mount point only for PostgreSQL data.

Nevertheless, I was able always to ssh to the machine, so machine itself
was not in hard hang and ext4 mostly gets recover by itself (it took
30min). But I have seen situation, were every process who 'touch' the ext4
goes immediately to D state and does not recover even after hour.

-- 
Nikola
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html