[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <14013437.bAvQTZLQL2@wuerfel>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 15:40:06 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, tytso@....edu,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, y2038@...ts.linaro.org,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/24] fs: ext4: Use current_time() for inode timestamps
On Sunday, June 19, 2016 5:27:05 PM CEST Deepa Dinamani wrote:
> @@ -3727,6 +3727,7 @@ static int ext4_cross_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
> };
> u8 new_file_type;
> int retval;
> + struct timespec ctime;
>
> if ((ext4_encrypted_inode(old_dir) ||
> ext4_encrypted_inode(new_dir)) &&
> @@ -3829,8 +3830,9 @@ static int ext4_cross_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
> * Like most other Unix systems, set the ctime for inodes on a
> * rename.
> */
> - old.inode->i_ctime = ext4_current_time(old.inode);
> - new.inode->i_ctime = ext4_current_time(new.inode);
> + ctime = current_time(old.inode);
> + old.inode->i_ctime = ctime;
> + new.inode->i_ctime = ctime;
> ext4_mark_inode_dirty(handle, old.inode);
> ext4_mark_inode_dirty(handle, new.inode);
>
Adding a local variable here looks like it is going to cause us trouble when we
change the return type of current_time() to timespec64.
I'd write this as
new.inode->i_ctime = old.inode->i_ctime;
instead.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists