| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2016 07:00:13 -0400
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
To: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>,
Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
xfs@....sgi.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v23 01/22] vfs: Add IS_ACL() and IS_RICHACL() tests
On Thu, 2016-06-30 at 15:46 +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> The vfs does not apply the umask for file systems that support acls.
> The test used for this used to be called IS_POSIXACL(). Switch to a new
> IS_ACL() test to check for either posix acls or richacls instead. Add a
> new MS_RICHACL flag and IS_RICHACL() test for richacls alone. The
> IS_POSIXACL() test is still needed in some places like nfsd.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>
> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@...hat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>
> Reviewed-by: Steve French <steve.french@...marydata.com>
> ---
> fs/Kconfig | 3 +++
> fs/namei.c | 6 +++---
> include/linux/fs.h | 12 ++++++++++++
> include/uapi/linux/fs.h | 3 ++-
> 4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/Kconfig b/fs/Kconfig
> index b8fcb41..de6de55 100644
> --- a/fs/Kconfig
> +++ b/fs/Kconfig
> @@ -64,6 +64,9 @@ endif # BLOCK
> config FS_POSIX_ACL
> def_bool n
>
> +config FS_RICHACL
> + def_bool n
> +
> config EXPORTFS
> tristate
>
> diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
> index 70580ab..7cc5487 100644
> --- a/fs/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/namei.c
> @@ -3115,7 +3115,7 @@ static int lookup_open(struct nameidata *nd, struct path *path,
> * O_EXCL open we want to return EEXIST not EROFS).
> */
> if (open_flag & O_CREAT) {
> - if (!IS_POSIXACL(dir->d_inode))
> + if (!IS_ACL(dir->d_inode))
> mode &= ~current_umask();
> if (unlikely(!got_write)) {
> create_error = -EROFS;
> @@ -3709,7 +3709,7 @@ retry:
> if (IS_ERR(dentry))
> return PTR_ERR(dentry);
>
> - if (!IS_POSIXACL(path.dentry->d_inode))
> + if (!IS_ACL(path.dentry->d_inode))
> mode &= ~current_umask();
> error = security_path_mknod(&path, dentry, mode, dev);
> if (error)
> @@ -3780,7 +3780,7 @@ retry:
> if (IS_ERR(dentry))
> return PTR_ERR(dentry);
>
> - if (!IS_POSIXACL(path.dentry->d_inode))
> + if (!IS_ACL(path.dentry->d_inode))
> mode &= ~current_umask();
> error = security_path_mkdir(&path, dentry, mode);
> if (!error)
> diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> index dd28814..4ad130c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -1850,6 +1850,12 @@ struct super_operations {
> #define IS_IMMUTABLE(inode) ((inode)->i_flags & S_IMMUTABLE)
> #define IS_POSIXACL(inode) __IS_FLG(inode, MS_POSIXACL)
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FS_RICHACL
> +#define IS_RICHACL(inode) __IS_FLG(inode, MS_RICHACL)
> +#else
> +#define IS_RICHACL(inode) 0
> +#endif
> +
> #define IS_DEADDIR(inode) ((inode)->i_flags & S_DEAD)
> #define IS_NOCMTIME(inode) ((inode)->i_flags & S_NOCMTIME)
> #define IS_SWAPFILE(inode) ((inode)->i_flags & S_SWAPFILE)
> @@ -1863,6 +1869,12 @@ struct super_operations {
> (inode)->i_rdev == WHITEOUT_DEV)
>
> /*
> + * IS_ACL() tells the VFS to not apply the umask
> + * and use check_acl for acl permission checks when defined.
> + */
> +#define IS_ACL(inode) __IS_FLG(inode, MS_POSIXACL | MS_RICHACL)
> +
> +/*
> * Inode state bits. Protected by inode->i_lock
> *
> * Three bits determine the dirty state of the inode, I_DIRTY_SYNC,
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/fs.h b/include/uapi/linux/fs.h
> index 3b00f7c..f9c41ef 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/fs.h
> @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ struct inodes_stat_t {
> #define MS_VERBOSE 32768 /* War is peace. Verbosity is silence.
> MS_VERBOSE is deprecated. */
> #define MS_SILENT 32768
> -#define MS_POSIXACL (1<<16) /* VFS does not apply the umask */
> +#define MS_POSIXACL (1<<16) /* Supports POSIX ACLs */
> #define MS_UNBINDABLE (1<<17) /* change to unbindable */
> #define MS_PRIVATE (1<<18) /* change to private */
> #define MS_SLAVE (1<<19) /* change to slave */
> @@ -130,6 +130,7 @@ struct inodes_stat_t {
> #define MS_I_VERSION (1<<23) /* Update inode I_version field */
> #define MS_STRICTATIME (1<<24) /* Always perform atime updates */
> #define MS_LAZYTIME (1<<25) /* Update the on-disk [acm]times lazily */
> +#define MS_RICHACL (1<<26) /* Supports richacls */
>
> /* These sb flags are internal to the kernel */
> #define MS_NOSEC (1<<28)
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists