linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH v2] xfstests, generic: add project quota attribute tests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 6 Jul 2016 21:47:28 -0500
From:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>
To:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
	Wang Shilong <wangshilong1991@...il.com>
Cc:	fstests@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, tytso@....edu,
	sihara@....com, lixi@....com, Wang Shilong <wshilong@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xfstests, generic: add project quota attribute tests

On 7/6/16 6:35 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:

...

>> +_require_scratch
>> +_require_chattr
>> +_require_test_lsattr
>> +_require_quota
> 
> needs  _require_prjquota, and that function needs to be modified to
> detect for both XFS and ext4 support.

I think that if there is desire to test both xfs and non-xfs userspace
with project quota, then we need to differentiate between "e2fsprogs
and linux-quota and the kernel all support it" and "xfsprogs and
the kernel both support it" don't we?

IOWs if the test uses setquota/repquota, chattr, mkfs, and fsck to
work with project quota, then that's a different set of requirements
from a test using xfs_io, xfs_quota, etc.

-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html