[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160718102056.GA6782@quack2.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 12:20:56 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Wang Shilong <wangshilong1991@...il.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, fstests@...r.kernel.org,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
Shuichi Ihara <sihara@....com>, Li Xi <lixi@....com>,
Wang Shilong <wshilong@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xfstests, generic: add project quota attribute tests
On Fri 15-07-16 10:15:31, Wang Shilong wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> wrote:
> > On Tue 12-07-16 12:15:47, Ted Tso wrote:
>
> >> Does that sound like a plan?
> >
> > Yes. quotaoff will already disable only enforcement for ext4 with hidden
> > quota files so there's no need to change anything there. We just need to
> > add kernel support for enabling quota enforcement based on mount option.
> > Attached patch should do that - I still need to test whether it doesn't
> > break anything so don't apply it yet, just have a look whether it looks
> > sane to you.
>
> I sent a similar patch weeks ago.
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-ext4&m=146787897927183&w=2
Your patch was actually quite different. It did implement prjquota option
but the option did something else than in my patch... In your patch you
implemented prjquota option to match the behavior of original quota in
normal files. In my patch I've implemented behavior of prjquota option to
behave similarly as in XFS - i.e. enable enforcement of project quotas when
project quota feature is enabled.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists