[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1469493335-3622-3-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 03:35:04 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCHv1, RFC 02/33] radix tree test suite: Allow GFP_ATOMIC allocations to fail
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>
In order to test the preload code, it is necessary to fail GFP_ATOMIC
allocations, which requires defining GFP_KERNEL and GFP_ATOMIC properly.
Remove the obsolete __GFP_WAIT and copy the definitions of the __GFP
flags which are used from the kernel include files. We also need the
real definition of gfpflags_allow_blocking() to persuade the radix tree
to actually use its preallocated nodes.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
---
tools/testing/radix-tree/linux.c | 7 ++++++-
tools/testing/radix-tree/linux/gfp.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
tools/testing/radix-tree/linux/slab.h | 5 -----
3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/radix-tree/linux.c b/tools/testing/radix-tree/linux.c
index 154823737b20..3cfb04e98e2f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/radix-tree/linux.c
+++ b/tools/testing/radix-tree/linux.c
@@ -33,7 +33,12 @@ mempool_t *mempool_create(int min_nr, mempool_alloc_t *alloc_fn,
void *kmem_cache_alloc(struct kmem_cache *cachep, int flags)
{
- void *ret = malloc(cachep->size);
+ void *ret;
+
+ if (flags & __GFP_NOWARN)
+ return NULL;
+
+ ret = malloc(cachep->size);
if (cachep->ctor)
cachep->ctor(ret);
uatomic_inc(&nr_allocated);
diff --git a/tools/testing/radix-tree/linux/gfp.h b/tools/testing/radix-tree/linux/gfp.h
index 0e37f7a760eb..5b09b2ce6c33 100644
--- a/tools/testing/radix-tree/linux/gfp.h
+++ b/tools/testing/radix-tree/linux/gfp.h
@@ -1,10 +1,26 @@
#ifndef _GFP_H
#define _GFP_H
-#define __GFP_BITS_SHIFT 22
+#define __GFP_BITS_SHIFT 26
#define __GFP_BITS_MASK ((gfp_t)((1 << __GFP_BITS_SHIFT) - 1))
-#define __GFP_WAIT 1
-#define __GFP_ACCOUNT 0
-#define __GFP_NOWARN 0
+
+#define __GFP_HIGH 0x20u
+#define __GFP_IO 0x40u
+#define __GFP_FS 0x80u
+#define __GFP_NOWARN 0x200u
+#define __GFP_ATOMIC 0x80000u
+#define __GFP_ACCOUNT 0x100000u
+#define __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM 0x400000u
+#define __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM 0x2000000u
+
+#define __GFP_RECLAIM (__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM|__GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM)
+
+#define GFP_ATOMIC (__GFP_HIGH|__GFP_ATOMIC|__GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM)
+#define GFP_KERNEL (__GFP_RECLAIM | __GFP_IO | __GFP_FS)
+
+static inline bool gfpflags_allow_blocking(const gfp_t gfp_flags)
+{
+ return !!(gfp_flags & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM);
+}
#endif
diff --git a/tools/testing/radix-tree/linux/slab.h b/tools/testing/radix-tree/linux/slab.h
index 6d5a34770fd4..452e2bf502e3 100644
--- a/tools/testing/radix-tree/linux/slab.h
+++ b/tools/testing/radix-tree/linux/slab.h
@@ -7,11 +7,6 @@
#define SLAB_PANIC 2
#define SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT 0x00020000UL /* Objects are reclaimable */
-static inline int gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp_t mask)
-{
- return 1;
-}
-
struct kmem_cache {
int size;
void (*ctor)(void *);
--
2.8.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists