[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160804160550.GA12861@quack2.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 18:05:50 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Nikolay Borisov <kernel@...p.com>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>,
linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Sleeping function called in invalid context
On Wed 03-08-16 10:22:03, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> While doing some testing on today's checkout of Linus' master branch I
> got the following:
>
> [ 9.302725] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at ./include/linux/buffer_head.h:358
> [ 9.304403] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 1718, name: mount
> [ 9.305633] 8 locks held by mount/1718:
Yeah, this looks like a regression cause by commit 4743f83990614af "ext4:
Fix WARN_ON_ONCE in ext4_commit_super()". Arguably that cure is worse than
the disease but OTOH calling ext4_commit_super() from an atomic context
(like __ext4_grp_locked_error() does) sucks as well.
I'm not sure what the right fix is here. The cleanest would probably be to
always drop group lock in __ext4_grp_locked_error() and make sure we always
properly bail out of mballoc code on such error. But that's a non-trivial
amount of work. Not sure if other ext4 people have opinion on this?
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists