linux-ext4 - Re: Sleeping function called in invalid context

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 4 Aug 2016 18:05:50 +0200
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	Nikolay Borisov <kernel@...p.com>
Cc:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>,
	linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Sleeping function called in invalid context

On Wed 03-08-16 10:22:03, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> While doing some testing on today's checkout of Linus' master branch I
> got the following: 

> 
> [    9.302725] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at ./include/linux/buffer_head.h:358
> [    9.304403] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 1718, name: mount
> [    9.305633] 8 locks held by mount/1718:

Yeah, this looks like a regression cause by commit 4743f83990614af "ext4:
Fix WARN_ON_ONCE in ext4_commit_super()". Arguably that cure is worse than
the disease but OTOH calling ext4_commit_super() from an atomic context
(like __ext4_grp_locked_error() does) sucks as well.

I'm not sure what the right fix is here. The cleanest would probably be to
always drop group lock in __ext4_grp_locked_error() and make sure we always
properly bail out of mballoc code on such error. But that's a non-trivial
amount of work. Not sure if other ext4 people have opinion on this?

								Honza

-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html