linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH] fsck: fix strange logic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160810214028.GB10523@thunk.org>
Date:	Wed, 10 Aug 2016 17:40:28 -0400
From:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>
Cc:	Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fsck: fix strange logic

On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 02:26:21PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> I'll push a v2 patch that keeps the original logic, and Ted can choose
> which one is correct.
>

The original logic is what's intended.  What's going on here is that
the argument to -C is optional (for backwards compatibility reasons),
and we know it's always going to be a positive integer, since it's a
file descriptor.  If the next argument begins with a '-', it must be
an option specifier, and the argument to -C was missing.  If the next
argument does not begin with a '-', then we try to parse it as an
integer, and we rely on the fact that in general the device specifier
to fsck generally begins with a '/', and if not, isn't going to be
parseable as a number.

						- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html