[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160910041519.nmim57wyptdynwxh@thunk.org>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 00:15:19 -0400
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, jaegeuk@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fscrypto: require write access to mount to set
encryption policy
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 02:20:38PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> [To apply cleanly, my other two patches must be applied before this one]
>
> Since setting an encryption policy requires writing metadata to the
> filesystem, it should be guarded by mnt_want_write/mnt_drop_write.
> Otherwise, a user could cause a write to a frozen or readonly
> filesystem. This was handled correctly by f2fs but not by ext4. Make
> fscrypt_process_policy() handle it rather than relying on the filesystem
> to get it right.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 4.1+; check fs/{ext4,f2fs}
Thanks, I have this in the ext4.git's fixes branch, but I plan to only
send the other two fixes to Linus, since (a) they are more critical,
and I'd prefer to get an Acked-by from Jaeguk or Changman (as the f2fs
maintainers) before I send this fix to Linus, since it touches f2fs.
Jaeguk, Changman, any objections?
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists