[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160915025441.GA80824@google.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 19:54:41 -0700
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, tytso@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fscrypto: make filename crypto functions return 0 on
success
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 05:10:21PM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 04:00:45PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > Several filename crypto functions: fname_decrypt(),
> > fscrypt_fname_disk_to_usr(), and fscrypt_fname_usr_to_disk(), returned
> > the output length on success or -errno on failure. However, the output
> > length was redundant with the value written to 'oname->len'. It is also
> > potentially error-prone to make callers have to check for '< 0' instead
> > of '!= 0'.
>
> At a glance, you missed some places like
> - fscrypt_fname_usr_to_disk() in ext4_symlink() and f2fs_symlink()
> - fscrypt_fname_disk_to_usr() in dx_show_leaf() and f2fs_fill_dentries()
>
Those callers don't have to be updated because they only check for an error
value --- they don't use the return value as a length. I did check all the
callers of fscrypt_fname_{usr_to_disk,disk_to_usr()}, and only the three I
update in the patch used the return value as a length.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists