linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 2/6 linux-next] ext4: remove unneeded test in ext4_alloc_file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160915155252.5k453j76dgrveqgf@thunk.org>
Date:   Thu, 15 Sep 2016 11:52:52 -0400
From:   Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:     Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>
Cc:     Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6 linux-next] ext4: remove unneeded test in
 ext4_alloc_file_blocks()

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:03:16PM +0200, Fabian Frederick wrote:
> ext4_alloc_file_blocks() is called from ext4_zero_range() and
> ext4_fallocate() both already testing EXT4_INODE_EXTENTS
> We can call ext_depth(inode) unconditionnally.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>

Applied, although I also added a BUG_ON() check to make sure
ext4_alloc_file_blocks() won't get called with an indirect-mapped
inode in the future.

				- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html