lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160915165412.GA52239@jaegeuk>
Date:   Thu, 15 Sep 2016 09:54:12 -0700
From:   Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To:     Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
Cc:     linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, tytso@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fscrypto: make filename crypto functions return 0 on
 success

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 07:54:41PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 05:10:21PM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > Hi Eric,
> > 
> > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 04:00:45PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > > Several filename crypto functions: fname_decrypt(),
> > > fscrypt_fname_disk_to_usr(), and fscrypt_fname_usr_to_disk(), returned
> > > the output length on success or -errno on failure.  However, the output
> > > length was redundant with the value written to 'oname->len'.  It is also
> > > potentially error-prone to make callers have to check for '< 0' instead
> > > of '!= 0'.
> > 
> > At a glance, you missed some places like
> > - fscrypt_fname_usr_to_disk() in ext4_symlink() and f2fs_symlink()
> > - fscrypt_fname_disk_to_usr() in dx_show_leaf() and f2fs_fill_dentries()
> > 
> 
> Those callers don't have to be updated because they only check for an error
> value --- they don't use the return value as a length.  I did check all the
> callers of fscrypt_fname_{usr_to_disk,disk_to_usr()}, and only the three I
> update in the patch used the return value as a length.

Hmm, your patch tries to change the return value and make its usage more
consistent. So, I think it should have been considered to change if (err < 0)
to if (err) entirely in order to avoid any potential mistake; this patch already
addresses it in some cases, but not all.

e.g., in f2fs_symlink,

	err = fscrypt_fname_usr_to_disk(inode, &istr, &ostr);
	if (err < 0)
		goto err_out;

BTW, in dx_show_leaf(),
	res = fscrypt_fname_disk_to_usr(dir,
		0, 0, &de_name,
		&fname_crypto_str);
	if (res < 0)
		...

IMHO, it'd be better to use err instead of {res|ret} when considering naming
convention.

Thanks,

> 
> Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ