[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6789d30e-f95d-d8bd-cd6e-664a89c0dfd1@nod.at>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 14:24:35 +0200
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: ext4, f2fs: fscrypt_has_permitted_context() check in file open
Hi!
Both ext4 and f2fs check in the file open code the context of the parent directory too:
ext4:
if (ext4_encrypted_inode(d_inode(dir)) &&
!fscrypt_has_permitted_context(d_inode(dir), inode)) {
ext4_warning(inode->i_sb,
"Inconsistent encryption contexts: %lu/%lu",
(unsigned long) d_inode(dir)->i_ino,
(unsigned long) inode->i_ino);
dput(dir);
return -EPERM;
}
f2fs:
if (f2fs_encrypted_inode(d_inode(dir)) &&
!fscrypt_has_permitted_context(d_inode(dir), inode)) {
dput(dir);
return -EPERM;
}
Why do we need this check? AFAIK this situation can never happen unless due to
a bug in the filesystem code.
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists