lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161018141231.5tmxeua23u3fqeh7@thunk.org>
Date:   Tue, 18 Oct 2016 10:12:31 -0400
From:   Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:     Nikolay Borisov <kernel@...p.com>
Cc:     linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
Subject: Re: sleeping function called in atomic

On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 03:33:19PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> Hello, 
> 
> I've been seeing the following splat ever since 4.8-rc1: 
> 
> [    2.795057] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at ./include/linux/buffer_head.h:358
> [    2.796742] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 993, name: mount
> [    2.797966] CPU: 0 PID: 993 Comm: mount Not tainted 4.9.0-rc1-clouder1 #62
> [    2.798952] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.8.1-0-g4adadbd-20150316_085822-nilsson.home.kraxel.org 04/01/2014
> [    2.798952]  ffff880006423548 ffffffff81318c89 ffffffff819ecdd0 0000000000000166
> [    2.798952]  ffff880006423558 ffffffff810810b0 ffff880006423580 ffffffff81081153
> [    2.798952]  ffff880006e5a1a0 ffff88000690e400 0000000000000000 ffff8800064235c0
> [    2.798952] Call Trace:
> [    2.798952]  [<ffffffff81318c89>] dump_stack+0x67/0x9e
> [    2.798952]  [<ffffffff810810b0>] ___might_sleep+0xf0/0x140
> [    2.798952]  [<ffffffff81081153>] __might_sleep+0x53/0xb0
> [    2.798952]  [<ffffffff8126c1dc>] ext4_commit_super+0x19c/0x290
> [    2.798952]  [<ffffffff8126e61a>] __ext4_grp_locked_error+0x14a/0x230
> [    2.798952]  [<ffffffff81081153>] ? __might_sleep+0x53/0xb0
> [    2.798952]  [<ffffffff812822be>] ext4_mb_generate_buddy+0x1de/0x320

What's going on is that your file system is corrupted;
ext4_mb_generate_buddy() noticed that the number of free blocks as
claimed by the block group descriptors doesn't match with with the
number of free blocks as found in the allocation bitmap.  It calls
ext4_grp_locked_error() as a result, and in ext4_commit_super(), the
commit 4743f8399061: "ext4: Fix WARN_ON_ONCE in ext4_commit_super()"
we started taking a lock even when ext4_commit_super() is called with
sync == 0, which causes the lockdep complaint.

Thanks for reporting the problem.  I'll get a fix for 4.9, but note
that if you're seeing it a lot, you may want to take a look at when
your file system is getting corrupted when you run under KVM.  Perhaps
the writeback / caching policy which you're using is dangerous?

    	      		       	     	    	  - Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ