lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161023193320.rlzlaxdi4vbyu7of@thunk.org>
Date:   Sun, 23 Oct 2016 15:33:20 -0400
From:   Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
Cc:     Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        fstests@...r.kernel.org, tarasov@...ily.name
Subject: Re: Test generic/299 stalling forever

On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 08:32:49AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> 
> Very strange. Can you see who the owner is of stat_mutex->lock, that's
> the pthread_mutex_t they are sleeping on.
> 
> For now, I'll apply the work-around you sent. I haven't been able to
> reproduce this, but knowing that it's the stat_mutex will allow me to
> better make up a test case to hit it.

Well, that's the wierd thing.  I can't see anything that could be
holding the stat_mutex.  This is from a somewhat older version of fio
(fio-2.14-27-gafd2cef) but there when things wedged, there were four
threads hanging here (with the exact same stack trace):

Thread 5 (Thread 0x7fb3ddfed700 (LWP 19800)):
#0  pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/pthread_cond_wait.S:185
#1  0x000000000043987b in verify_async_thread (data=0x7fb3c7590610) at verify.c:1241
#2  0x00007fb3dd85d0a4 in start_thread (arg=0x7fb3ddfed700) at pthread_create.c:309
#3  0x00007fb3dd38e62d in clone () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:111

... and the main thread was hanging here:

Thread 1 (Thread 0x7fb3de190740 (LWP 19781)):
#0  0x00007fb3dd35ff2d in nanosleep () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:81
#1  0x00007fb3dd387fb4 in usleep (useconds=<optimized out>) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/usleep.c:32
#2  0x000000000045b541 in thread_main (data=0x18fca000) at backend.c:1738
#3  0x000000000045d4d3 in run_threads (sk_out=sk_out@...ry=0x0) at backend.c:2268
#4  0x000000000045d80d in fio_backend (sk_out=sk_out@...ry=0x0) at backend.c:2400
#5  0x000000000040cbc8 in main (argc=2, argv=0x7ffd24b952e8, envp=<optimized out>) at fio.c:65


The verify threads were waiting td->verify_cond, which it looks like
the main thread was supposed to wakeup in its shutdown sequence when
it calls verify_async_exit(), or if there was work to be done via the
verify_io_u_async() end_io callback.  But the verify threads don't
take the stat_mutex, and the only places that take the stat_mutex in
stat.c and backend.c don't hold it for long, and I can't see any
longjumps or other progam flow discontinuities that could have left
stat_mutex locked.

I'm not an expert on pthreads debugging; is there some way to figure
out ala CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKiNG, which thread took the mutex, and at what
line number?  Or would we need to to try hacking in some kind of mutex
debugging code into fio_mutex_down(), et. al.?

Cheers,

					- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ