linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCHv4 18/43] block: define BIO_MAX_PAGES to HPAGE_PMD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161025125431.GA22787@node.shutemov.name>
Date:   Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:54:31 +0300
From:   "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
        Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 18/43] block: define BIO_MAX_PAGES to HPAGE_PMD_NR if
 huge page cache enabled

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:21:22AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 03:13:17AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > We are going to do IO a huge page a time. So we need BIO_MAX_PAGES to be
> > at least HPAGE_PMD_NR. For x86-64, it's 512 pages.
> 
> NAK.  The maximum bio size should not depend on an obscure vm config,
> please send a standalone patch increasing the size to the block list,
> with a much long explanation.  Also you can't simply increase the size
> of the largers pool, we'll probably need more pools instead, or maybe
> even implement a similar chaining scheme as we do for struct
> scatterlist.

The size of required pool depends on architecture: different architectures
has different (huge page size)/(base page size).

Would it be okay if I add one more pool with size equal to HPAGE_PMD_NR,
if it's bigger than than BIO_MAX_PAGES and huge pages are enabled?

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html