[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161101224550.GA2314@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 16:45:50 -0600
From: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Ted Tso <tytso@....edu>,
linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] ext4: Convert ext4 DAX IO to iomap framework
On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 09:12:35AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 10:06:10PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > this patch set converts ext4 DAX IO paths to the new iomap framework and
> > removes the old bh-based DAX functions. As a result ext4 gains PMD page
> > fault support, also some other minor bugs get fixed. The patch set is based
> > on Ross' DAX PMD page fault support series [1]. It passes xfstests both in
> > DAX and non-DAX mode.
> >
> > The question is how shall we merge this. If Dave is pulling PMD patches through
> > XFS tree, then these patches could go there as well (chances for conflicts
> > with other ext4 stuff are relatively low) or Dave could just export a stable
> > branch with PMD series which Ted would just pull...
>
> I plan to grab Ross's PMD series in the next couple of days and I'll
> push it out as a stable topic branch once I've sanity tested it. I
> don't really want to take a big chunk of ext4 stuff through the XFS
> tree if it can be avoided....
Yea, we also need to figure out how to get Jan's "dax: Clear dirty bits after
flushing caches" set merged, which is mostly MM stuff and I think will go
through akpm's tree? That set is also based on my PMD stuff.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists