lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri,  4 Nov 2016 18:08:16 +0100
From:   Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com, Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@...l.ru>,
        linux-ntfs-dev@...ts.sourceforge.net, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] fs: Remove unmap_underlying_metadata

Nobody is using this function anymore. Remove it.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
---
 fs/buffer.c                 | 32 --------------------------------
 include/linux/buffer_head.h |  1 -
 2 files changed, 33 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
index f96c079e181d..6d6680c8d306 100644
--- a/fs/buffer.c
+++ b/fs/buffer.c
@@ -1605,38 +1605,6 @@ void create_empty_buffers(struct page *page,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(create_empty_buffers);
 
-/*
- * We are taking a block for data and we don't want any output from any
- * buffer-cache aliases starting from return from that function and
- * until the moment when something will explicitly mark the buffer
- * dirty (hopefully that will not happen until we will free that block ;-)
- * We don't even need to mark it not-uptodate - nobody can expect
- * anything from a newly allocated buffer anyway. We used to used
- * unmap_buffer() for such invalidation, but that was wrong. We definitely
- * don't want to mark the alias unmapped, for example - it would confuse
- * anyone who might pick it with bread() afterwards...
- *
- * Also..  Note that bforget() doesn't lock the buffer.  So there can
- * be writeout I/O going on against recently-freed buffers.  We don't
- * wait on that I/O in bforget() - it's more efficient to wait on the I/O
- * only if we really need to.  That happens here.
- */
-void unmap_underlying_metadata(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block)
-{
-	struct buffer_head *old_bh;
-
-	might_sleep();
-
-	old_bh = __find_get_block_slow(bdev, block);
-	if (old_bh) {
-		clear_buffer_dirty(old_bh);
-		wait_on_buffer(old_bh);
-		clear_buffer_req(old_bh);
-		__brelse(old_bh);
-	}
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(unmap_underlying_metadata);
-
 /**
  * clean_bdev_aliases: clean a range of buffers in block device
  * @bdev: Block device to clean buffers in
diff --git a/include/linux/buffer_head.h b/include/linux/buffer_head.h
index d1ab91fc6d43..d67ab83823ad 100644
--- a/include/linux/buffer_head.h
+++ b/include/linux/buffer_head.h
@@ -168,7 +168,6 @@ int inode_has_buffers(struct inode *);
 void invalidate_inode_buffers(struct inode *);
 int remove_inode_buffers(struct inode *inode);
 int sync_mapping_buffers(struct address_space *mapping);
-void unmap_underlying_metadata(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block);
 void clean_bdev_aliases(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block,
 			sector_t len);
 static inline void clean_bdev_bh_alias(struct buffer_head *bh)
-- 
2.6.6

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ