[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161115185309.GE127180@google.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 10:53:09 -0800
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, jaegeuk@...nel.org, richard@....at,
luto@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fscrypto: don't use on-stack buffer for key
derivation
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:47:04AM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 03:03:02PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > With the new (in 4.9) option to use a virtually-mapped stack
> > (CONFIG_VMAP_STACK), stack buffers cannot be used as input/output for
> > the scatterlist crypto API because they may not be directly mappable to
> > struct page. get_crypt_info() was using a stack buffer to hold the
> > output from the encryption operation used to derive the per-file key.
> > Fix it by using a heap buffer.
> >
> > This bug could most easily be observed in a CONFIG_DEBUG_SG kernel
> > because this allowed the BUG in sg_set_buf() to be triggered.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
>
> This commit is on the fscrypt and dev branches on ext4.git.
>
> - Ted
Hi Ted,
Would it make any sense to send these two patches to Linus for v4.9-rc6, given
that they fix bugs introduced in 4.9 with the virtually-mapped stack feature?
Or would you prefer to wait and have them go to 4.9 via stable?
Note that CONFIG_VMAP_STACK defaults to y on x86_64.
Thanks,
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists