[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161228022814.7xrkhfp4mr5f4mgo@thunk.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 21:28:14 -0500
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
David Gstir <david@...ma-star.at>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] fscrypt: use ENOKEY when file cannot be created
w/o key
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 11:12:44AM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> As part of an effort to clean up fscrypt-related error codes, make
> attempting to create a file in an encrypted directory that hasn't been
> "unlocked" fail with ENOKEY. Previously, several error codes were used
> for this case, including ENOENT, EACCES, and EPERM, and they were not
> consistent between and within filesystems. ENOKEY is a better choice
> because it expresses that the failure is due to lacking the encryption
> key. It also matches the error code returned when trying to open an
> encrypted regular file without the key.
>
> I am not aware of any users who might be relying on the previous
> inconsistent error codes, which were never documented anywhere.
>
> This failure case will be exercised by an xfstest.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
Applied to the fscrypt branch, thanks.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists