lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1483372522.1955.20.camel@perches.com> Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2017 07:55:22 -0800 From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, linux-mm@...ck.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Anatoly Stepanov <astepanov@...udlinux.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca> Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: introduce kv[mz]alloc helpers On Mon, 2017-01-02 at 14:37 +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com> > > Using kmalloc with the vmalloc fallback for larger allocations is a > common pattern in the kernel code. Yet we do not have any common helper > for that and so users have invented their own helpers. Some of them are > really creative when doing so. Let's just add kv[mz]alloc and make sure > it is implemented properly. This implementation makes sure to not make > a large memory pressure for > PAGE_SZE requests (__GFP_NORETRY) and also > to not warn about allocation failures. This also rules out the OOM > killer as the vmalloc is a more approapriate fallback than a disruptive > user visible action. > > This patch also changes some existing users and removes helpers which > are specific for them. In some cases this is not possible (e.g. > ext4_kvmalloc, libcfs_kvzalloc, __aa_kvmalloc) because those seems to be > broken and require GFP_NO{FS,IO} context which is not vmalloc compatible > in general (note that the page table allocation is GFP_KERNEL). Those > need to be fixed separately. > > apparmor has already claimed kv[mz]alloc so remove those and use > __aa_kvmalloc instead to prevent from the naming clashes. I have no real objection but perhaps this would be better done as 3 or more patches o rename apparmor uses o introduce generic o conversions to generic -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists