linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 4/8] xfs: use memalloc_nofs_{save,restore} instead of memalloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170109155653.GD22368@bfoster.bfoster>
Date:   Mon, 9 Jan 2017 10:56:53 -0500
From:   Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, djwong@...nel.org,
        "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org, cluster-devel@...hat.com,
        linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, logfs@...fs.org,
        linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-ntfs-dev@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] xfs: use memalloc_nofs_{save,restore} instead of
 memalloc_noio*

On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 03:11:03PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> 
> kmem_zalloc_large and _xfs_buf_map_pages use memalloc_noio_{save,restore}
> API to prevent from reclaim recursion into the fs because vmalloc can
> invoke unconditional GFP_KERNEL allocations and these functions might be
> called from the NOFS contexts. The memalloc_noio_save will enforce
> GFP_NOIO context which is even weaker than GFP_NOFS and that seems to be
> unnecessary. Let's use memalloc_nofs_{save,restore} instead as it should
> provide exactly what we need here - implicit GFP_NOFS context.
> 
> Changes since v1
> - s@...alloc_noio_restore@...alloc_nofs_restore@ in _xfs_buf_map_pages
>   as per Brian Foster
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> ---

Looks fine to me:

Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>

>  fs/xfs/kmem.c    | 10 +++++-----
>  fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c |  8 ++++----
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/kmem.c b/fs/xfs/kmem.c
> index a76a05dae96b..d69ed5e76621 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/kmem.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/kmem.c
> @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ kmem_alloc(size_t size, xfs_km_flags_t flags)
>  void *
>  kmem_zalloc_large(size_t size, xfs_km_flags_t flags)
>  {
> -	unsigned noio_flag = 0;
> +	unsigned nofs_flag = 0;
>  	void	*ptr;
>  	gfp_t	lflags;
>  
> @@ -80,14 +80,14 @@ kmem_zalloc_large(size_t size, xfs_km_flags_t flags)
>  	 * context via PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO to prevent memory reclaim re-entering
>  	 * the filesystem here and potentially deadlocking.
>  	 */
> -	if ((current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS) || (flags & KM_NOFS))
> -		noio_flag = memalloc_noio_save();
> +	if (flags & KM_NOFS)
> +		nofs_flag = memalloc_nofs_save();
>  
>  	lflags = kmem_flags_convert(flags);
>  	ptr = __vmalloc(size, lflags | __GFP_HIGHMEM | __GFP_ZERO, PAGE_KERNEL);
>  
> -	if ((current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS) || (flags & KM_NOFS))
> -		memalloc_noio_restore(noio_flag);
> +	if (flags & KM_NOFS)
> +		memalloc_nofs_restore(nofs_flag);
>  
>  	return ptr;
>  }
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> index 7f0a01f7b592..8cb8dd4cdfd8 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> @@ -441,17 +441,17 @@ _xfs_buf_map_pages(
>  		bp->b_addr = NULL;
>  	} else {
>  		int retried = 0;
> -		unsigned noio_flag;
> +		unsigned nofs_flag;
>  
>  		/*
>  		 * vm_map_ram() will allocate auxillary structures (e.g.
>  		 * pagetables) with GFP_KERNEL, yet we are likely to be under
>  		 * GFP_NOFS context here. Hence we need to tell memory reclaim
> -		 * that we are in such a context via PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO to prevent
> +		 * that we are in such a context via PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS to prevent
>  		 * memory reclaim re-entering the filesystem here and
>  		 * potentially deadlocking.
>  		 */
> -		noio_flag = memalloc_noio_save();
> +		nofs_flag = memalloc_nofs_save();
>  		do {
>  			bp->b_addr = vm_map_ram(bp->b_pages, bp->b_page_count,
>  						-1, PAGE_KERNEL);
> @@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ _xfs_buf_map_pages(
>  				break;
>  			vm_unmap_aliases();
>  		} while (retried++ <= 1);
> -		memalloc_noio_restore(noio_flag);
> +		memalloc_nofs_restore(nofs_flag);
>  
>  		if (!bp->b_addr)
>  			return -ENOMEM;
> -- 
> 2.11.0
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html