lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAJrWOzDLhjdX=FV18Wty7bOkzD7rn_rcBUT2610O4XYqxgqpQg@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 13:36:50 +0100 From: Roman Penyaev <roman.penyaev@...fitbricks.com> To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Roman Pen <roman.penyaev@...fitbricks.com>, Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>, Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ext4: Do not populate extents tree with outdated offsets while shifting extents On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 09:26:01PM +0100, Roman Pen wrote: >> Inside ext4_ext_shift_extents() function ext4_find_extent() is called >> without EXT4_EX_NOCACHE flag, which should prevent cache population. >> >> This leads to oudated offsets in the extents tree and wrong blocks >> afterwards. >> >> Patch fixes the problem providing EXT4_EX_NOCACHE flag for each >> ext4_find_extents() call inside ext4_ext_shift_extents function. >> >> Signed-off-by: Roman Pen <roman.penyaev@...fitbricks.com> > > Thanks, applied. Could you please provide with the SHA1 of the patch in your branch? I want to make an exact reference in a new test of the xfstest which covers that bug. -- Roman -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists