Message-ID: <CAJrWOzBPn98QPptcJWNUpaTBzCWvqN-N3f8Sk+J7zje8v0Qx7w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 10 Jan 2017 16:07:49 +0100
From:   Roman Penyaev <roman.penyaev@...fitbricks.com>
To:     "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Cc:     linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: Refreshed rootfs.img for kvm-xfstests

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Roman Penyaev
<roman.penyaev@...fitbricks.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 4:38 AM, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 06:14:50PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>>> There is an updated rootfs.img file available at:
>>>
>>>     https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/tytso/kvm-xfstests
>>
>> ... and here are the latest test results using gce-xfstests on the
>> ext4.git's dev branch (which includes Roman's fixes).  I've annotated
>> the test failures report here and attached a compressed copy of the
>> runtests.log file:
>>
>> CMDLINE: full
>> FSTESTIMG: gce-xfstests/xfstests-201701091217
>> FSTESTVER: e2fsprogs    v1.43.3-30-g8df85fb (Sun, 4 Sep 2016 21:32:35 -0400)
>> FSTESTVER: fio          fio-2.16 (Mon, 19 Dec 2016 23:12:56 -0700)
>> FSTESTVER: quota                2b37958 (Tue, 9 Aug 2016 19:17:56 +0200)
>> FSTESTVER: xfsprogs     v4.9.0-1-g07d66eb (Sat, 7 Jan 2017 23:27:26 -0500)
>> FSTESTVER: xfstests-bld 39124a6 (Mon, 9 Jan 2017 11:09:14 -0500)
>> FSTESTVER: xfstests     linux-v3.8-1306-gbeffdf1 (Sun, 8 Jan 2017 20:30:22 -0500)
>> FSTESTVER: kernel       4.10.0-rc3-ext4-00014-g2b3864b32403 #195 SMP Mon Jan 9 01:32:06 EST 2017 x86_64
>> FSTESTCFG: "all"
>> FSTESTSET: "-g auto"
>> FSTESTEXC: ""
>> FSTESTOPT: "aex"
>> MNTOPTS: ""
>> CPUS: "2"
>> MEM: "7477.96"
>> MEM: 7680 MB (Max capacity)
>> BEGIN TEST 4k: Ext4 4k block Mon Jan  9 12:26:16 EST 2017
>> Passed all 245 tests
>> BEGIN TEST 1k: Ext4 1k block Mon Jan  9 13:16:48 EST 2017
>> Failures: generic/018 generic/270 generic/273
>>    generic/018 -- defrag test failure --- ignore
>>    generic/270 -- known lockdep problem in quota code
>>    generic/273 -- we aren't reserving enough blocks on a 2GB 1k file system,
>>        so ENOSPC block reservation test is failing.
>> BEGIN TEST ext3: Ext4 4k block emulating ext3 Mon Jan  9 14:13:51 EST 2017
>> Failures: generic/382
>>    generic/382 -- quota test which doesn't take indirect blocks into account.
>> BEGIN TEST encrypt: Ext4 encryption Mon Jan  9 14:57:29 EST 2017
>> Failures: ext4/022 generic/382
>>    ext4/022 -- ENOSPC test involving encryption and xattr
>>    generic/382 -- quota test which should be suppresed with encryption
>> BEGIN TEST nojournal: Ext4 4k block w/ no journal Mon Jan  9 15:22:05 EST 2017
>> Failures: ext4/301
>>    ext4/301 -- defrag failure with no journal?
>> BEGIN TEST ext3conv: Ext4 4k block w/nodelalloc and no flex_bg Mon Jan  9 16:07:55 EST 2017
>> Failures: generic/347
>>    generic/347 --- file system got corrupted?!?
>> BEGIN TEST adv: Ext4 advanced features (inline_data, metadata_csum, 64bit) Mon Jan  9 16:53:22 EST 2017
>> Failures: generic/396 generic/399
>>    generic/396 --- fscrypt releated: file system got corrupted?!?
>>    generic/399 --- fscrypt releated: file system never filled up?!?
>> BEGIN TEST dioread_nolock: Ext4 4k block w/dioread_nolock Mon Jan  9 17:39:38 EST 2017
>> Passed all 245 tests
>> BEGIN TEST data_journal: Ext4 4k block w/data=journal Mon Jan  9 18:25:55 EST 2017
>> Failures: generic/347
>>    generic/347 -- file system got corruptd?!?
>> BEGIN TEST bigalloc: Ext4 4k block w/bigalloc Mon Jan  9 19:35:00 EST 2017
>> Failures: ext4/004 generic/204 generic/219 generic/235 generic/273 generic/399
>>    ext4/004 --- dump restore failure (with bigalloc --- not surprising)
>>    generic/204 --- ENOSPC during test
>>    generic/219 --- too many blocks used (quota accounting)
>>    generic/235 --- clusters vs blocks accounting in quota code
>>    generic/273 --- not reserving enough space (porter not complete)
>>    generic/399 --- fscrypt releated: file system corrupted?!?
>> BEGIN TEST bigalloc_1k: Ext4 1k block w/bigalloc Mon Jan  9 20:17:46 EST 2017
>> Failures: ext4/004 generic/204 generic/235 generic/273nnn
>>    ext4/004 --- dump restore failure (with bigalloc --- not surprising)
>>    generic/204 --- ENOSPC during test
>>    generic/235 --- clusters vs blocks accounting in quota code
>>    generic/273 --- not reserving enough space (porter not complete)?!?
>>
>> Some of these are test bugs that we should fix or suppress.  Others,
>> such as the new encryption tests causing corrupted file systems in the
>> more exotic file system configurations, are definitely bugs that we
>> need to fix.
>>
>
> I retested the following configurations on 69973b830859 ("Linux 4.9"):
>
> ./kvm-xfstests.sh -c nojournal    ext4/301
> ./kvm-xfstests.sh -c ext3conv     generic/347
> ./kvm-xfstests.sh -c adv          generic/396 generic/399
> ./kvm-xfstests.sh -c data_journal generic/347
> ./kvm-xfstests.sh -c bigalloc     generic/399
> ./kvm-xfstests.sh -c bigalloc_1k  generic/273
>
> all of the tests from list have failed.

I executed the list above on these kernels:

c8d2bc9bc39e ("Linux 4.8")
523d939ef98f ("Linux 4.7")
2dcd0af568b0 ("Linux 4.6")
b562e44f507e ("Linux 4.5")

and the picture stays the same: tests continue to fail.
(once I saw '-c data_journal generic/347' on 4.6 has passed, but
 I failed to repeat this success).

Theodore, do you have successful reference run for these configurations?

Because, I am pretty much confused: either I do something completely
wrong (seems checking "FSTESTVER: kernel" line should be enough to
be sure, that tests are executed on desired kernel version) or those
tests were broken long time ago.

--
Roman

>
> This is not very much helpful, but at least that can be a starting
> point for bisecting.
>
> When there was a successful xfstests run at least for some of
> the configurations?  Would be nice to have a "good" reference.
>
> --
> Roman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists