[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170321134500.GA1318@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 06:45:00 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 00/30] fs: inode->i_version rework and optimization
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 05:43:27PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> To me, the interesting question is whether this allows us to turn on
> i_version updates by default on xfs and ext4.
XFS v5 file systems have it on by default. Although we'll still need
to agree on the exact semantics of i_version before it's going to be
useful.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists