linux-ext4 - Re: [RFC PATCH v1 00/30] fs: inode->i

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <42bec37f-670c-3ea1-f2aa-7cecd619ad7e@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 31 Mar 2017 00:11:11 +0300
From:   Boaz Harrosh <openosd@...il.com>
To:     Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
        "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Cc:     Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 00/30] fs: inode->i_version rework and optimization

On 03/30/2017 09:35 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
<>
> Yeah, I imagine we'd need a on-disk change for this unless there's
> something already present that we could use in place of a crash counter.
> 

Perhaps we can use s_mtime and/or s_wtime in some way, I'm not sure
what is a parallel for that in xfs.
	s_mtime - time-of-last mount 
	s_wtime - time-of-last mount, umount, freez, unfreez, remount, ...
Of course you'll need a per FS vector to access that.

But this will need some math foo to get the bits compacted correctly
just a thought.

Thanks
Boaz