[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871st519vf.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name>
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 07:53:08 +1000
From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tytso@....edu, jack@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] fs: introduce new writeback error tracking infrastructure and convert ext4 to use it
On Thu, Apr 06 2017, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 03:12:42PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 05 2017, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>>
>> > On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 10:02:48AM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
>> >> If you are concerned about space in 'struct address_space', just prune
>> >> some wastage.
>> >
>> > I'm trying to (via wlists). still buggy though.
>>
>> Cool.
>> (I wonder what a wlist is.... weighted list?)
>
> A homonym ;-) Waitlists. Yet Another Variation of a doubly linked list.
> This variation has only a single head pointer (like the hlist), allows
> O(1) deletion from any point in the list (but requires that you know the
> head of the list). The tail of the list is pointed to by head->prev.
>
> http://git.infradead.org/users/willy/linux-dax.git/shortlog/refs/heads/wlist
>
> It also needs updating to the latest tree; WW locks got revamped.
So nothing points to the head, meaning you need both the node and the
head to delete something. But the head is smaller.
I can see how that would be useful.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (833 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists