[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAO3qy=Hs0aPRjQzAT7jceo9sikiT22yooJkRT8QUmyqEnCcqWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 00:25:27 +0300
From: Artem Blagodarenko <artem.blagodarenko@...gate.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e2fsck: fix type mismatch bug in the largedir patch
Hello Theodore,
Thank you for fixing this mistake. I didn't fixed this after switched
from my ext2fs_has_feature_laregdir to
EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_FUNCS(largedir, 4, LARGEDIR).
Reviewed-by: Artem Blagodarenko <artem.blagodarenko@...gate.com>
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 11:56 PM, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> wrote:
> Commit ae9efd05a986: "e2fsck: 3 level hash tree directory
> optimization" introduced a bug when checking for the largedir feature.
>
> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
> ---
>
> I should have noticed the build warning sooner, but then again, so the
> patch author should have as well. :-)
>
> e2fsck/pass2.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/e2fsck/pass2.c b/e2fsck/pass2.c
> index fc98e833..09b79c3b 100644
> --- a/e2fsck/pass2.c
> +++ b/e2fsck/pass2.c
> @@ -978,7 +978,7 @@ static int check_dir_block(ext2_filsys fs,
> * very large and then the files are deleted. For now, all that is
> * needed is to avoid e2fsck filling in these holes as part of
> * feature flag. */
> - if (db->blk == 0 && ext2fs_has_feature_largedir(fs))
> + if (db->blk == 0 && ext2fs_has_feature_largedir(fs->super))
> return 0;
>
> if (db->blk == 0 && !inline_data_size) {
> --
> 2.11.0.rc0.7.gbe5a750
>
--
Artem Blagodarenko Ph.D.ยท SW Developer on my.seagate.com
Seagate Technology, LLC
www.seagate.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists