lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170430042605.v3myihn2x4lolmso@thunk.org>
Date:   Sun, 30 Apr 2017 00:26:05 -0400
From:   Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:     Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ext4: no need to cond_resched() in
 ext4_trim_all_free()

On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 10:36:40AM +0200, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> There is no need to call cond_resched() in ext4_trim_all_free() since
> blkdev_issue_discard() already takes care of that. So just remove it.

Actually, it could be needed.  If minblocks is a small value, say 2,
and every other block in file system is allocated, then we could be in
the while loop for a long time.  That's a pretty unusual case, but
it's good to have the need_resched() check there.

						- Ted

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ