[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170508184112.GJ5973@birch.djwong.org>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 11:41:12 -0700
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
To: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
Cc: Michael Kerrisk-manpages <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-man@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ioctl_getfsmap.2: document the GETFSMAP ioctl
On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 12:17:53AM +0200, Jann Horn wrote:
> On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 5:58 PM, Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com> wrote:
> > Document the new GETFSMAP ioctl that returns the physical layout of a
> > (disk-based) filesystem.
> [...]
> > +.B EPERM
> > +This query is not allowed.
>
> Please document the circumstances under which a query is allowed.
For the two current implementations, queries are always allowed.
(The doc could be more explicit about this decision being left to the
implementation.)
> Also: From a quick glance at the XFS implementation, I don't see any
> privilege checks. Am I missing something, or does this API permit an
> unprivileged user to determine the number of physical blocks allocated
> for any inode, even for inodes the user can't ordinarily see in any
> way?
Correct.
--D
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists