[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAeU0aMboDdSD9gdkscDU6jGEB1bV6AFCW+FqHz9XjuQcH1Arw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 09:13:35 -0700
From: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@...gle.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...nel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...sity.com>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>,
Mike Christie <mchristi@...hat.com>,
Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com,
reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/28] ext4: extended attribute value size limit is
enforced by vfs
Hi Darrick,
>> -#define EXT4_XATTR_MAX_LARGE_EA_SIZE (1024 * 1024)
>
> Uhhh... didn't you add this in patch 1/28? There's little point in
> adding a symbol just to delete it shortly thereafter.
>
1/28 is the original patch I've received from Andreas. I wanted to
leave his patch in its original form as much as possible so that the
modifications I made on them are clear. If preferred, I can squash
them later, but I thought it is a little clearer this way.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists