[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170610053441.GD6365@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 06:34:41 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@...e.de>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, jack@...e.com,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
axboe@...nel.dk, linux-api@...r.kernel.org, adam.manzanares@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/10 v11] No wait AIO
On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 12:39:10AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> As already indicated this whole series looks fine to me.
>
> Al: are you going to pick this up? Or Andrew?
The main issue here is "let's bail out from ->write_iter() instances"
patch. It very obviously has holes in coverage.
Could we have FMODE_AIO_NOWAIT and make those who claim to support it
set that in ->open()? And make aio check that and bail out if asked
for nowait on a file without that flag...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists