[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170614112238.14121-1-hch@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 13:22:38 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: remove timebomb in ext4_decode_extra_time()
Changing behavior based on the version code is a timebomb waiting to
happen, and not easily bisectable. Drop it and leave any removal
to explicit developer action. (And I don't think file system
should _ever_ remove backwards compatibility that has no explicit
flag, but I'll leave that to the ext4 folks).
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
---
fs/ext4/ext4.h | 12 +++---------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
index 32191548abed..d35749e7cf9f 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
@@ -838,21 +838,15 @@ static inline void ext4_decode_extra_time(struct timespec *time, __le32 extra)
{
if (unlikely(sizeof(time->tv_sec) > 4 &&
(extra & cpu_to_le32(EXT4_EPOCH_MASK)))) {
-#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(4,20,0)
+
/* Handle legacy encoding of pre-1970 dates with epoch
- * bits 1,1. We assume that by kernel version 4.20,
- * everyone will have run fsck over the affected
- * filesystems to correct the problem. (This
- * backwards compatibility may be removed before this
- * time, at the discretion of the ext4 developers.)
+ * bits 1,1. (This backwards compatibility may be removed
+ * at the discretion of the ext4 developers.)
*/
u64 extra_bits = le32_to_cpu(extra) & EXT4_EPOCH_MASK;
if (extra_bits == 3 && ((time->tv_sec) & 0x80000000) != 0)
extra_bits = 0;
time->tv_sec += extra_bits << 32;
-#else
- time->tv_sec += (u64)(le32_to_cpu(extra) & EXT4_EPOCH_MASK) << 32;
-#endif
}
time->tv_nsec = (le32_to_cpu(extra) & EXT4_NSEC_MASK) >> EXT4_EPOCH_BITS;
}
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists