lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20170615145541.GA14028@infradead.org> Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 07:55:41 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@...e.de>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, jack@...e.com, linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, axboe@...nel.dk, linux-api@...r.kernel.org, adam.manzanares@....com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/10 v11] No wait AIO On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 12:11:58PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > Which flags are you talking about? aio ones? AFAICS, it's the same > kind of thing as "can we lseek?" or "can we read/pread?", etc. > What would that field look like? Note that some of those might depend > upon the flags passed to open(), so shoving them into file_operations > might mean splitting file_operations instances... Details, please. Yeah, I'll take my suggestion back.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists