lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CABjLfghjnf1RCq8mZccbFmbJmJE_qR+iDzP6rQ2pNhA6f-v5eQ@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 02:42:33 +0200 From: Danesh Daroui <danesh.daroui@...il.com> To: Nikolay Borisov <n.borisov.lkml@...il.com> Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Regression test (or generic tests) for Linux filesystems Thanks for the clarification! Regards, Dan On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Nikolay Borisov <n.borisov.lkml@...il.com> wrote: > > > On 17.06.2017 20:45, Danesh Daroui wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> Just a quick question. I am wondering if there is any test suite >> available for ext4 fs or basic fs functionalists in Linux, shipped >> with kernel as a module or so, then developers would be able to run >> the test (or modify them for new features) to ensure fs integrity on a >> local branch before submitting a patch for review? >> >> I have already found xfstests at: >> >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git/tree/ >> >> but I am not sure if this is the right one (haven't tried yet) or if >> there is any better test suite even more specific tailored for ext4. > > > xfstest is the de-facto testsuite for linux filesystems. It not only has > generic tests but also fs-specific ones e.g. ext4. So go with it. > >> >> Thanks for your answer, >> >> Dan >>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists