[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170620123433.GB19781@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 05:34:33 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
tytso@....edu, axboe@...nel.dk, mawilcox@...rosoft.com,
ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com, corbet@....net,
Chris Mason <clm@...com>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
"Darrick J . Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@...hat.com>,
Eryu Guan <eguan@...hat.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 11/22] fs: new infrastructure for writeback error
handling and reporting
> @@ -393,6 +394,7 @@ struct address_space {
> gfp_t gfp_mask; /* implicit gfp mask for allocations */
> struct list_head private_list; /* ditto */
> void *private_data; /* ditto */
> + errseq_t wb_err;
> } __attribute__((aligned(sizeof(long))));
> /*
> * On most architectures that alignment is already the case; but
> @@ -847,6 +849,7 @@ struct file {
> * Must not be taken from IRQ context.
> */
> spinlock_t f_lock;
> + errseq_t f_wb_err;
> atomic_long_t f_count;
> unsigned int f_flags;
> fmode_t f_mode;
Did you check the sizes of the structure before and after?
These places don't look like holes in the packing, but there probably
are some available.
> +static inline int filemap_check_wb_err(struct address_space *mapping, errseq_t since)
Overly long line here (the patch has a few more)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists