lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 29 Jun 2017 13:53:19 -0400
From:   Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:     Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mkfs.ext4 -D option fails to mount

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 09:57:27AM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 09:35:38AM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> > Our validation team noticed that in some configurations mkfs.ext4 with the
> > -D option creates a filesystem that can't be mounted:

The -D option just means that we're doing the I/O using Direct I/O (as
opposed to buffered I/O).  It shouldn't make any difference to what
gets written, so this very much smells like a bug in how /dev/pmem
supports Direct I/O...

> One more bit of info - this seems to be strongly tied to the size of the
> block device.  With a 32 GB block device it works fine, with 248 GB you get
> overlap messages for groups 1 through 63, and with a 250 GB device you get
> overlaps for groups 1 through 1999.

This very much sounds like Direct I/O is just getting completely
botched for the pmem device, and writes to a block group descriptor
block is affecting the wrong place on the storage device.

      	 	       	     	      - Ted

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ