[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170629175319.s75rdncvejil357p@thunk.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 13:53:19 -0400
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mkfs.ext4 -D option fails to mount
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 09:57:27AM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 09:35:38AM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> > Our validation team noticed that in some configurations mkfs.ext4 with the
> > -D option creates a filesystem that can't be mounted:
The -D option just means that we're doing the I/O using Direct I/O (as
opposed to buffered I/O). It shouldn't make any difference to what
gets written, so this very much smells like a bug in how /dev/pmem
supports Direct I/O...
> One more bit of info - this seems to be strongly tied to the size of the
> block device. With a 32 GB block device it works fine, with 248 GB you get
> overlap messages for groups 1 through 63, and with a 250 GB device you get
> overlaps for groups 1 through 1999.
This very much sounds like Direct I/O is just getting completely
botched for the pmem device, and writes to a block group descriptor
block is affecting the wrong place on the storage device.
- Ted
Powered by blists - more mailing lists