linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH v8 18/18] btrfs: minimal conversion to errseq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1498768325.5710.6.camel@poochiereds.net>
Date:   Thu, 29 Jun 2017 16:32:05 -0400
From:   Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, jlayton@...nel.org
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        tytso@....edu, axboe@...nel.dk, mawilcox@...rosoft.com,
        ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com, corbet@....net,
        Chris Mason <clm@...com>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
        "Darrick J . Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
        Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@...hat.com>,
        Eryu Guan <eguan@...hat.com>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@...cle.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 18/18] btrfs: minimal conversion to errseq_t
 writeback error reporting on fsync

On Thu, 2017-06-29 at 07:17 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 09:19:54AM -0400, jlayton@...nel.org wrote:
> > From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
> > 
> > Just check and advance the errseq_t in the file before returning.
> > Internal callers of filemap_* functions are left as-is.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
> > ---
> >  fs/btrfs/file.c | 7 +++++--
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c
> > index da1096eb1a40..1f57e1a523d9 100644
> > --- a/fs/btrfs/file.c
> > +++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c
> > @@ -2011,7 +2011,7 @@ int btrfs_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end, int datasync)
> >  	struct btrfs_root *root = BTRFS_I(inode)->root;
> >  	struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans;
> >  	struct btrfs_log_ctx ctx;
> > -	int ret = 0;
> > +	int ret = 0, err;
> >  	bool full_sync = 0;
> >  	u64 len;
> >  
> > @@ -2030,7 +2030,7 @@ int btrfs_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end, int datasync)
> >  	 */
> >  	ret = start_ordered_ops(inode, start, end);
> >  	if (ret)
> > -		return ret;
> > +		goto out;
> >  
> >  	inode_lock(inode);
> >  	atomic_inc(&root->log_batch);
> > @@ -2227,6 +2227,9 @@ int btrfs_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end, int datasync)
> >  		ret = btrfs_end_transaction(trans);
> >  	}
> >  out:
> > +	err = file_check_and_advance_wb_err(file);
> > +	if (!ret)
> > +		ret = err;
> >  	return ret > 0 ? -EIO : ret;
> 
> This means that we'll lose the exact error returned from
> start_ordered_ops.  Beyond that I can't really provide good feedback
> as the btrfs fsync code looks so much different from all the other
> fs fsync code..

Well, no...we'll keep the error from start_ordered_ops if there was one.
 We just advance the cursor past any stored error in that case without
returning it.

I have another fix for this patch too: there's a call to
filemap_check_errors in this function that I think should probably use
filemap_check_wb_err instead. Fixed in my tree.

I do agree though that while this works in my testing I'd like the btrfs
guys to ACK this as I don't fully grok the btrfs fsync code at all.
-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>