lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20170630164959.GA2395@infradead.org> Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 09:49:59 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, jlayton@...nel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, tytso@....edu, axboe@...nel.dk, mawilcox@...rosoft.com, ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com, corbet@....net, Chris Mason <clm@...com>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>, David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, "Darrick J . Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>, Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@...hat.com>, Eryu Guan <eguan@...hat.com>, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@...cle.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 17/18] xfs: minimal conversion to errseq_t writeback error reporting On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 12:45:54PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > Should I aim to do that with an individual patch for each fs, or is it > better to do a swath of them all at once in a single patch here? I'd be perfectly happy with one big patch for all the trivial conversions.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists