[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170630164959.GA2395@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 09:49:59 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, jlayton@...nel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
tytso@....edu, axboe@...nel.dk, mawilcox@...rosoft.com,
ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com, corbet@....net,
Chris Mason <clm@...com>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
"Darrick J . Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@...hat.com>,
Eryu Guan <eguan@...hat.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@...cle.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 17/18] xfs: minimal conversion to errseq_t writeback
error reporting
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 12:45:54PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> Should I aim to do that with an individual patch for each fs, or is it
> better to do a swath of them all at once in a single patch here?
I'd be perfectly happy with one big patch for all the trivial
conversions.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists