linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 06/12] e2fsck: update i_blocks accounting for ea

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAeU0aM7MGcVkAkY5oDzGDDCdTHiARm_ykjPKbJz7Y=YnT5Xgg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 29 Jun 2017 18:39:37 -0700
From:   Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@...gle.com>
To:     Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>
Cc:     "Darrick J . Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
        "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
        Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/12] e2fsck: update i_blocks accounting for ea_inode feature

>> This makes it all the more important that the "fast symlink" checking be
>> divorced from i_blocks, and instead depend on i_size.  Otherwise, we will
>> have yet another bunch of problems as large xattrs on a fast symlink will
>> incorrectly result in problems with the symlink.
>>
> Totally agree. The changes to i_blocks accounting for ea_inode feature
> likely broke ext4_inode_is_fast_symlink() in kernel. I will try to fix
> that first.

FYI, I sent out a patch to fix e2fsprogs part too: ("[PATCH]
e2fsprogs: add ext2fs_is_fast_symlink() function")