[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170713171335.GT31999@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 18:13:35 +0100
From: "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@...hat.com>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: Fast symlinks stored slow
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 12:49:59PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 09:02:13AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > From my point of view it's not too much trouble to recreate these
> > filesystems, and we've already proposed a fix for supermin so it
> > creates symlinks properly[1].
>
> My concern is that people using libguestfs, et.al., on Fedura XX and
> then try to decide to upgrade to the 4.13 kernel. So it sounds like
> the exposure could be pretty large. Am I wrong?
In this case we're using libext2fs to build an appliance filesystem,
used to boot a small Linux system which is then run under qemu by
libguestfs. This appliance is completely rebuilt automatically under
many circumstances, for example a host package upgrade (eg. upgrading
the kernel), so it's not a long-lived filesystem that would cause a
problem. Rebuilding only takes a few seconds.
The process is described in more detail here:
http://libguestfs.org/supermin.1.html#SUPERMIN-APPLIANCES
>From our point of view the only issue are some prebuilt appliances
which we have provided to other distributions that cannot / don't want
to use supermin (http://download.libguestfs.org/binaries/appliance/)
and at some point I'm going to have to rebuild these using the fixed
supermin.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many
powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc.
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top
Powered by blists - more mailing lists