lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 24 Jul 2017 00:11:53 -0400
From:   Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:     Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@...gle.com>
Cc:     Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e2fsck: eliminate bad update link count attempt

On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 05:50:35AM -0700, Tahsin Erdogan wrote:
> Extended attribute inodes have a link count of 1 but they are not
> attached to any directories. When an xattr inode with zero ea
> references is found, the remedy is to reconnect it to lost+found dir.
> Since reconnect operation increments the link count, it would normally
> become 2 but to avoid that, check_ea_inode() sets the link count to
> zero in anticipation of reconnect operation. And it does it even when
> e2fsck is invoked with -n option which causes a fatal e2fsck failure
> as can be demonstrated with the following test script:
> 
>   mke2fs -b 4096 -I 256 -F -O extent,ea_inode /dev/sdb 1G
>   mount /dev/sdb /mnt/sdb
>   touch /mnt/sdb/x
>   setfattr -n user.ie1 -v $(python -c "print 'v'*5000") /mnt/sdb/x
>   umount /dev/sdb
>   debugfs -w -R 'rm x' /dev/sdb
>   e2fsck -f -n /dev/sdb
> 
> In this case, e2fsck fails with the following error:
> 
>   e2fsck 1.43.5-WIP (17-Feb-2017)
>   Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
>   Pass 2: Checking directory structure
>   Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
>   Pass 4: Checking reference counts
>   ext2fs_write_inode: Attempt to write to filesystem opened read-only
>   while writing inode 13 in check_ea_inode
>   e2fsck: aborted
> 
> Setting link count to zero is not really required because e2fsck will
> detect the discrepancy in link count and offer to fix it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@...gle.com>

Thanks, applied.

					- Ted

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ