[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170725064304.GA11723@amd>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 08:43:04 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Reindl Harald <h.reindl@...lounge.net>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kent.overstreet@...il.com, linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: bcache with existing ext4 filesystem
On Tue 2017-07-25 00:51:56, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 10:04:51PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Question for you was... Is the first 1KiB of each ext4 filesystem still
> > free and "reserved for a bootloader"?
>
> Yes.
Thanks.
> > If I needed more for bcache superblock (8KiB, IIRC), would that be
> > easy to accomplish on existing filesystem?
>
> Huh? Why would the bcache superblock matter when you're talking about
> the ext4 layout? The bcache superblock will be on the bcache
> device/partition, and the ext4 superblock will be on the ext4
> device/partition.
I'd like to enable bcache on already existing ext4 partition. AFAICT
normal situation, even on the backing device, is:
| 8KiB bcache superblock | 1KiB reserved | ext4 superblock | 400GB data |
Unfortunately, that would mean shifting 400GB data 8KB forward, and
compatibility problems. So I'd prefer adding bcache superblock into
the reserved space, so I can have caching _and_ compatibility with
grub2 etc (and avoid 400GB move):
| 1KiB (modified) bcache superblock | ext4 superblock | 400GB data |
Best regards,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists