[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <x49zibq3rb0.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 10:09:07 -0400
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] dax, ext4: Synchronous page faults
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> writes:
Hi, Jan,
Thanks for looking into this!
> There are couple of open questions with this implementation:
>
> 1) Is it worth the hassle?
> 2) Is S_SYNC good flag to use or should we use a new inode flag?
> 3) VM_FAULT_RO and especially passing of resulting 'pfn' from
> dax_iomap_fault() through filesystem fault handler to dax_pfn_mkwrite() in
> vmf->orig_pte is a bit of a hack. So far I'm not sure how to refactor
> things to make this cleaner.
4) How does an application discover that it is safe to flush from
userspace?
-Jeff
Powered by blists - more mailing lists