[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170728094001.GC29433@quack2.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 11:40:01 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] dax: Add sync argument to dax_iomap_fault()
On Thu 27-07-17 16:06:37, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 03:12:40PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Add 'sync' argument to dax_iomap_fault(). It will be used to communicate
> > the fact that synchronous fault is requested.
>
> I don't actually think you need to pass this 'sync' parameter around. I think
> you can completely rely on IOMAP_F_NEEDSYNC being set in iomap.flags. The DAX
> fault handlers can call ops->iomap_begin() and use that flag for all the
> tests and make it our once source of truth.
>
> That flag also tells us that we are doing a write fault (from
> ext4_iomap_begin()):
>
> if ((flags & IOMAP_FAULT) && (flags & IOMAP_WRITE) && IS_SYNC(inode) &&
> !jbd2_transaction_committed(EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_journal,
> EXT4_I(inode)->i_datasync_tid))
> iomap->flags |= IOMAP_F_NEEDDSYNC;
>
> So conditionals like this from dax_iomap_pte_fault():
>
> force_ro = (vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) && sync &&
> (iomap.flags & IOMAP_F_NEEDDSYNC);
>
> can be simplified to:
>
> force_ro = (iomap.flags & IOMAP_F_NEEDDSYNC);
Yeah, probably you're right. I'll look into changing this.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists