lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 26 Nov 2017 22:35:08 +0100
From:   Reindl Harald <h.reindl@...lounge.net>
To:     linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Subject: Re: regression: 4.13 cannot follow symlinks on some ext3 fs



Am 26.11.2017 um 22:14 schrieb Dave Chinner:
> On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 10:40:26AM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>> Are you
>> running some benchmarks that are logging into the root, and that's
>> triggering the ENOSPC condition?
> 
> No, I'm not doing anything like that on these machines. It's
> straight forward "something filled the root fs unexpectedly" type of
> error which I don't notice immediately...

have you ever considered to just buy larger disks or introduce quota 
because "Unlike ext3, ext4 is not a filesystem that takes kindly to 
being abused by an environment that involves machines being crashed, 
oopsed and forcibly rebooted without warning tens of times a day" caused 
by a full root fs is anyhting but a reasonable workload and i doubt any 
filesystem is intended to run under such abused environment

it would be even enough to not run that workload as root because that's 
the reserved diskspace is for

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ