linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 0/3] Improve kobject handling in fs/ext4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171128035105.lec6u6y4p3qwgjde@thunk.org>
Date:   Mon, 27 Nov 2017 22:51:05 -0500
From:   Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:     Riccardo Schirone <sirmy15@...il.com>
Cc:     adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Improve kobject handling in fs/ext4

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 12:17:58AM +0100, Riccardo Schirone wrote:
> This patch tries to correctly use kobjects in fs/ext4. In particular it
> allocates kobjects/ksets dynamically, instead of statically, and improve
> error handling in case kobject_* functions fail.

I don't see the point of allocating the kobjects in question
dynamically?  There is only one of them, so why not use static
allocation?  What is "incorrect" about not doing dynamically allocated
kobjects/ksets?

Regards,

						- Ted