linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH acks] fs/*/Kconfig: drop links to 404-compliant http://acl.bestbits.at

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 20 Dec 2017 07:14:22 -0700
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Adam Borowski <kilobyte@...band.pl>
Cc:     Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
        Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
        Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>,
        Ron Minnich <rminnich@...dia.gov>,
        Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@...kov.net>,
        v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net, Sage Weil <sage@...hat.com>,
        Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH acks] fs/*/Kconfig: drop links to 404-compliant
 http://acl.bestbits.at

On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 14:58:52 +0100
Adam Borowski <kilobyte@...band.pl> wrote:

> This link is replicated in most filesystems' config stanzas.  Referring
> to an archived version of that site is pointless as it mostly deals with
> patches; user documentation is available elsewhere.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@...band.pl>
> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
> Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> Acked-by: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@...cle.com>
> Acked-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
> Acked-by: "Yan, Zheng" <zyan@...hat.com>
> Acked-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
> Acked-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
> Acked-by: Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>
> ---
> No changes, acks added (Dave Kleikamp's came without CCs).
> 
> Acked: btrfs ceph cifs ext2 f2fs jfs xfs.
> No ack: . 9p ext4 hfsplus jffs2 reiserfs -- but there's no point in caring
> this much for a trivial doc update, molesting the maintainers further is a
> waste of their time.

So how would you like this to go upstream?  I can certainly take it
through docs, but it seems like vfs might be the first choice...?

Thanks,

jon