lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20171220071422.5177d2cf@lwn.net> Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 07:14:22 -0700 From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> To: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@...band.pl> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>, Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>, Ron Minnich <rminnich@...dia.gov>, Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@...kov.net>, v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net, Sage Weil <sage@...hat.com>, Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH acks] fs/*/Kconfig: drop links to 404-compliant http://acl.bestbits.at On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 14:58:52 +0100 Adam Borowski <kilobyte@...band.pl> wrote: > This link is replicated in most filesystems' config stanzas. Referring > to an archived version of that site is pointless as it mostly deals with > patches; user documentation is available elsewhere. > > Signed-off-by: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@...band.pl> > Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com> > Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> > Acked-by: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@...cle.com> > Acked-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com> > Acked-by: "Yan, Zheng" <zyan@...hat.com> > Acked-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com> > Acked-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org> > Acked-by: Steve French <smfrench@...il.com> > --- > No changes, acks added (Dave Kleikamp's came without CCs). > > Acked: btrfs ceph cifs ext2 f2fs jfs xfs. > No ack: . 9p ext4 hfsplus jffs2 reiserfs -- but there's no point in caring > this much for a trivial doc update, molesting the maintainers further is a > waste of their time. So how would you like this to go upstream? I can certainly take it through docs, but it seems like vfs might be the first choice...? Thanks, jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists